Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales

Argued March 22, 2006
Decided June 22, 2006

Full case name:	Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, Attorney General

Citations:	548 U.S. 30

Holding

Section 241(a)(5) applies to those who reentered the United States before IIRIRA’s effective date and does not retroactively affect any right of, or impose any burden on, the continuing violator of the INA now before this Court. 394 F. 3d 881, was affirmed.

Court membership

Chief Justice: John Glover Roberts, Jr.
Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito

Case opinions

Majority by: Souter
Joined by: Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito
Dissent by: Stevens

Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30 (2006) is a United States Supreme Court case that considered Fernandez-Vargas, a Mexican citizen who, after being deported, illegally reentered the United States in 1982, and remained undetected for over 20 years, fathering a son in 1989 and marrying the boy’s mother, a U.S. citizen, in 2001. He filed an application to adjust his status to that of a lawful permanent resident, but the Government began proceedings to reinstate his 1981 deportation order under §241(a)(5), and deported him. Fernandez-Vargas argued that because he illegally reentered the county before IIRIRA’s effective date, §241(a)(5) did not bar his application for an adjustment of status, and that §241(a)(5) would be impermissibly retroactive if it did bar his adjustment application. The Court held that Section 241(a)(5) applies to those who reentered the U.S. before IIRIRA’s effective date and does not retroactively affect any right of, or impose any burden on, the continuing violator of the INA now before this Court.