User talk:Fenice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] SCOTW
Hi Fenice,
You'll find that I've taken over Science Collaboration of the Week, which you seemed to be running, for the time being. Give me a nod when you come back! - Samsara contrib talk 10:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AID
Same thing with AID here. It'd be great if you returned just to help us maintain the stuff, you don't have to edit nothing ;-) --Dijxtra 12:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bye
May your Wikipedia user account rest in peace. haz (user talk) 19:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edit warring
Just to leave a note that the user page should say "edit warring with violetriga", as Fenice is the one that went against consensus and I merely undid the mistaken edits. violet/riga (t) 20:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- Why don't you save it for LiveJournal, Violetrag. I know it's old news, but editing a dead user's page knowing they're gone and won't respond is underhanded and cowardly. Fenice was a cool girl, and you should be ashamed for using edits as an excuse to drive her away. Every breath you take is a sin. FeniceFan 21:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- And leaving a psuedo personal attack against another user as your parting shot is the height of good conduct. violet/riga (t) 22:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Anymore and an admin will have to deal with this --DragonWR12LB 18:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Continued anonymous vandalization after retirement?
I have noticed some recent vandalization of blatant deletion which reminded me of past vandalization of blatant deletion. I have warned the IP address who made the changes, and suggested the link to here, as well as on the talk page of Electra complex. I am interested in what those who have had edit wars with this person have to add to this suspicion --Tyciol 08:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Did Fenice not give reasons for her edits? If so, is it proper to call it vandalism? -- Steven 22:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- A reason was given, but it was a blatant deletion rather than talking it over to resolve inconsistancies. I was called out on it and I admit, using vandalization was a bad term, I've learned from that to try and amend my wikiquette so as to give people the benefit of the doubt, especially when they do state part of a reason. Even so, if this was Fenice (I don't know, it might be someone entirely different), then it would lower my opinion. As I see it, Fenice wasn't a vandal, but did make the changes too blatantly, while ignoring the fact that much of the rest of the article is similarly unsourced. It's not been semi-sourced anyway. Tyciol 06:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Page name for temperature articles
To avoid flip-flopping between 'degree Fahrenheit' and 'Fahrenheit' or 'degree Celsius' and 'Celsius', I propose that we have a discussion on which we want. I see you have contributed on units of measurement, please express your opinion at Talk:Units of measurement. Thanks. bobblewik 22:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Protein purification is Science Collab of the Week
 |
You voted for Carbon and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Month! Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article. |
Samsara contrib talk 00:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Roma people won!
[edit] Hydrosphere is Science Collaboration
|
You voted for Carbon and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Month! Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article. |
Please also spread the word about, and vote for, next week's collaboration, as we have a three-way tie at two votes each!
Samsara (talk • contribs) 15:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SCOTW: Chronospecies finally makes it!
 |
As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Week, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Carbon. You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name! |
These are the comments on the nomination, which may be helpful in improving the article:
- Lots of potential for this little article like examples, causes, and general elaboration. Neum 04:38, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- A great fact to include would be the shortest time over which speciation of a sexual organism is known to have occurred. —James S. 21:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
In other news:
- SCOTW needs a new maintainer, and could to with a maintenance bot. If you know of anybody who may be interested in either task, please let them know!
- It took me a while, but I've learnt how to use these templates now!
Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Latin America won!
Joyous | Talk 18:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SCOTW
|
As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Week, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Ammonia. You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name! |
--Deryck C. 10:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Large Hadron Collider is Science Collaboration of the Week
|
As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Week, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Carbon. You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name! |
Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Biopharmaceutical is the Science Collaboration of the Week
|
As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Week, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Carbon. You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name! |
Samsara (talk • contribs) 21:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SCOTM
Since you haven't edited since January, I"m removing you from this list. Feel free to rejoin if you come back. pschemp | talk 03:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Chain Barnstar of Recognition
| Image:Bstar 500+.jpg | The Chain Barnstar of Recognition | |
| For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] The Chain Barnstar of Merit
| Image:Mer2.jpg | The Chain Barnstar of Merit | |
| For your hard work! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 4 others with 1500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] The Chain Barnstar of Diligence
| Image:Bstardil1.jpg | The Chain Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For shaping Wikipedia! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3 others with 2500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour
| Image:Wbstarhonour.jpg | The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour | |
| For building Wikipedia! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 2 others with 5000+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:CineVoter
A tag has been placed on Template:CineVoter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
