User:FelisLeo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FelisLeo.


Contents

[edit] Felis Leo, that's me

I don't focus on a specific subject while editing on Wikipedia. I get involved in vandalism fighting, which was my first love, new and random pages patrolling, RC patrol, some xFD discussions, copyediting, fixing small typo's, wikifying.

I am starting to read up on policy so and I always follow WP:BOLD so feel free to drop me a Line whenever you think I screwed something up.

In Wikiphilosophy I used to identify most with the deletionist school of thought although I didn't regard myself a deletionist. I still hate listcruft, fancruft and I religiously believe that WP:NOTDIR. I think I am able to listen to reason and I am not afraid to chang my initial point of view when good arguments are put on the table. I will not go for the deletion of an article at all cost but I will not hesitate to put up an CSD or prod tag on an article that clearly lacks notability, verifiable sources and references.


This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD

The motto of the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD is Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet, which translates to, "it is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia." This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.


[edit] Wiki activities todo List

  • Imagery analysis - copyediting/wikifying
  • Cathedral of Salerno - expansion based on .it wikipedia.

[edit] Userboxes & Defcon

Vandalism information

Level 3

Moderate to high level of vandalism. [update]

Increasing. Hellboy2hell (talk) 07:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Languages
nl Deze gebruiker spreekt Nederlands als moedertaal.
en-4 This user speaks English at a near-native level.
es-1 Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.
de-2 Dieser Benutzer hat fortgeschrittene Deutschkenntnisse.
fr-0 Cet utilisateur ne comprend pas le français, ou seulement avec des difficultés notables.
sar-5 This user is an expert at picking up on sarcasm, as well as making sarcastic remarks.
Me
This user is from the Netherlands.
This user has a pet cat.
This user uses Gmail as a primary E-mail service.
PULP This user does not think Marsellus Wallace looks like a bitch.
This user likes most types of music.
Firefox This user contributes using Mozilla Firefox.
Wikipedia
This user reserves the right to completely screw up his or her edits.
This user assumes good faith.
vn- 9 This user page has been vandalized 9 times.
This user is bold, but not reckless, in updating pages.
This user clicks on Random article way too often.
Quality, not quantity. This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Wikipedia.
This user is capable of fighting and reverting massive amounts of vandalism with huggle.

[edit] Links&Tools

My stats