Talk:Felicia (Darkstalkers)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Requested move
- Support. Less unambiguity, and is in style with many other articles. — Apostrophe 02:22, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Makes sense as there could be other video game characters called "Felicia". — VederJuda 03:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- There are other Felicias in video games, but they're mostly minor characters. I support the move.--Mitsukai 03:24, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support as per all that junk they said. - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:22, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
This article has been renamed after the result of a move request. Dragons flight 04:00, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
I am deleting the reference to Cham Cham as it is irrelevant. For the record, Darkstalkers and Samurai Shodown II were released mere months apart, so it is highly unlikely that either character's development influenced the other. Besides, do they really have that much in common? I don't think so. --Feitclub 14:15, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
- The reason they are compared so much is that the both games came out around the same time, and both are catgirls. That's many people wonder who came out first and if they influenced each other. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.68 (talk • contribs) 11:40, 15 April 2005.
-
- I HIGHLY doubt one influenced the other. I spent a LOT of time with these two games back in the day and never ONCE made the connection. In fact it's on this very wikipedia page that I'm first seeing this nonsense about "they are compared so much." 100% BS. Utils 19:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I'd phrase it more politely myself, but ... well, either way, it's completely unverifiable and an opinion, and the creators of Wikipedia have a thing about not liking either. —Yar Kramer 16:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Felicia(Darkstalkers).jpg
Image:Felicia(Darkstalkers).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)