User talk:Feelfunky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, Feelfunky, welcome to WikiProject Civil Engineering!

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles related to Civil engineering. Some points that may be helpful:

  • Our main aim is to help improve Civil engineering-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.
  • Project-wide affecting discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
  • The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, of which you are welcome to take part in.
  • If you're not sure how to help, take a quick look at our To Do list for ideas.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome!

Welcome to the project, good to see more civil engineers on here! Dumelow (talk) 12:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam?

But I don't really understand the {{advert}} part you have inserted? I have used lots of hours to make an article as neutral as possible, and researched to find references to back as much up as possible. -- Feelfunky (via e-mail)

When I see any article from a new user with even a faintly advert-like tone, I automatically assume "spam". Your claim of working hours, is the give-away! If you had no COI, then you would not even bother to say that you had tried to make it neutral! Now what I want to see is your user page with a few words showing your connection to Bubbledeck. You are allowed anonymity but something like "I am a senior director of Audeo Maxima International" would suit.
Do not worry about the {{advert}} tag - it is not a deletion tag. I do not hesitate to use {{db-spam}} when I feel it is appropriate! Likewise the {{wikify}} tag was mainly a concern about the way the pictures were presented. I suggest you now leave the article for others to work on, and certainly do not remove {{advert}} or the other maintenance tags.
Don't be discouraged - the good news is that your article has survived for two days! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the answer. I really appreciate it! And of course you are right - I am involved in this technology, hence my knowledge and interest. But that is certainly not the same as the article not being neutral, proper and most of all very relevant. The world wastes so many material resources and produces so much unnecessary CO2 because it uses old fashioned construction methods. Anyone who went through all the available material on this concept, would agree that the article is within the wiki concept and written properly. Anyone trying to do else here on wiki would be a fool... So I very much like others to give their input :o) --Feelfunky (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
And thank you for the user page. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)