Talk:Federation of Western India Cine Employees

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Wikiproject Indian cinema This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Indian politics workgroup.
This article is part of WikiProject Organized Labour, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Organized Labour. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.

From VfD:

Non-notable - only 2 Google results (from the same site) --Chessphoon 18:08, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

  • The Google test isn't definitive. My vote here is Delete, purely on the lack of information. If it can be expanded, sufficiently, then I may change to keep. Darksun 18:13, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment: Unsure. This was created by a user in good standing with lots of good edits, and listed for deletion four minutes later. I agree that it's currently a substub, but I think the listing here is premature. I've left a message for the creator in case they have just forgotten the page. I also agree that Google is not sufficient reason to delete, and therefore IMO neither is it sufficient reason to list on VfD. No vote at this stage. Andrewa 19:11, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. It seems the author is planning an extension of the article, but instead of adding a message here has placed an editor's note on the article page itself. Livajo 19:45, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • OK, I'm going to wait and see if this can develop beyond a series of short sections. Darksun 22:10, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • If it does have 50,000 members then it seems pretty notable to me. Keep. -- Necrothesp 13:33, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion