Talk:Federalist No. 49

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

⚖
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article has been assessed as High-importance on the assessment scale.
This article is within the scope of the United States WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Stub

This text was added by 209.23.170.77:

Since the legislative branch has many motives for operating for other departments, it is most likely to seize power from the other two branches. For instance, the delegates in the House and Senate have personal influence on the people. Therefore, the people will mostly likely side with the legislative branch in times of discord. Also, only few people partake in the other two branches, so a minute group of people personally know the delegates. More people mistrust the executive and judicial branch than the legislative and the former branches garner less popularity. This prevents people from feeling sympathy toward the two branches.
  • I reverted it. Is it accurate, as far as the content of the paper? If so, can it be added in an NPOV way? AubreyEllenShomo 19:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)