Talk:Federalist No. 37
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been assessed as High-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the United States WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
This text was added by 209.23.170.77, after the external links and categories:
- One of the problems that they faced was the cloudy medium of communication. The men could not find the accurate term to deliver the novelty of their ideas. Therefore, the indistinctness of the object, imperfection of the organ of conception, inadequateness of the vehicle of ideas troubled the establishment of an energetic and stable government. The second problem that they faced was the allocation of power amongst the three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Never before has this type of government tested, so the men argued over the possibility of the type. The third problem was the repeated change of men. This type of government requires frequent elections, which means a frequent change in power. The fourth problem outlined in this essay was giving much power to a single man: the president. The people witnessed the corruption of one man in power, the King of England, so they doubted whether one man can preserve the orderly decorum of the country. However, two things contributed to the success of the convention: exemption of hostility between parties and the understanding that sacrificing private opinions interests are necessary for a republic.
- I reverted it, and moved the text here. Is it accurate, as far as the content of the paper? If so, can it be added in an NPOV way? AubreyEllenShomo 19:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
