Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Featured portal co-directors: |
edit · history · watch · refresh |
|---|---|
| Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs) • OhanaUnited (talk · contribs) • Rudget (talk · contribs) | |
| List of portal peer review volunteers: |
edit · history · watch · refresh |
|
|
 Archives |
| 1 |
Contents |
[edit] Template:UpdatedDYKportal
Would be interested to hear your input, at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Template:UpdatedDYKportal. Cirt (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Portal bot work
As requested in Wikipedia_talk:Featured_portal_candidates/Archive_1#Archival_process_getting_tedious_-_time_for_a_bot.3F, I set up the bot to handle portal nominations. Since then, most of the closers are doing most of the tasks the bot does, including using the bot's closing tags. Therefore I have to double-check everything by hand. Do you want the bot to handle portals, or not? Gimmetrow 21:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- We definitely do, I think that some people are just confused as to how to close nomination discussions, in a manner that makes it easiest for the bot to work after that. Is there a set of instructions somewhere? Cirt (talk) 21:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia_talk:Featured_portal_candidates/Archive_1#Archival_process_getting_tedious_-_time_for_a_bot.3F. "Remove the transclusion from WP:FPOC and add it to the appropriate monthly featured or failed log" and add the portal to a category on the WP:FPO page. Gimmetrow 21:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Since you obviously do not want the bot doing anything here, it won't. Thank you. Gimmetrow 18:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WP:Portal guidelines
Is that page suitable as a style guideline for portals? Are there other pages that disagree with it that might be more useful? - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 16:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
