Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removing Featured Topics in Wikipedia

If you feel a topic on Wikipedia:Featured topics should no longer be featured, then this is the place to nominate it for demotion. Only topics that do not adhere to the featured topic criteria should be listed. Objections raised must be actionable.

Do not nominate topics that have recently been promoted (such complaints should have been brought up during the candidacy period on Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates), or topics that have recently survived a removal attempt—such nominations are likely to be removed summarily.

Once a topic has been nominated on this page for two weeks, it will be removed from the list of featured topics if the consensus is to remove, and added to the list of former featured topics. All discussions will be logged at Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/archive.

Purge the cache to refresh this page
Shortcuts:
WP:FTRC
WP:FTR

Featured content:

Featured topic tools:

Nomination procedure

  1. Place {{FTRCmain|EXAMPLE TOPIC NAME}} on the talk page of the main article of the topic.
  2. From there, click on the "add a comment" link.
  3. (If you are resubmitting a topic) Use the "Move" button to rename the previous nomination to an archive. For example, Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Plays by Shakespeare → Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Plays by Shakespeare/archive1
  4. Add ===EXAMPLE TOPIC NAME=== and the topic's box using {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/EXAMPLE TOPIC NAME}}.
  5. Below it, write your reason for nominating the topic. Note which of the featured topic criteria that the topic fails to meet.
  6. Place {{Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/name of nominated topic}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of the page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated article.
  7. Finally, announce the nomination on the featured topic candidates page for the benefit of users who do not check this page as often.

[edit] Supporting and objecting

Please read all the articles of the nominated topic fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

  • To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link).
  • If you approve of a nomination to remove, write '''Remove''' followed by your reasons.
  • If you oppose of a nomination to remove, write '''Keep''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a justification why the topic does not violate the listed criteria.
  • If you want to delay the nomination while another nomination takes place, such as adding new items to the topic or nominating member articles for Good Article status, write '''HOLD''' with a link to the relevant nomination and this nomination will not be closed until after the other one.
  • To withdraw a support or objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

Consensus must be reached for a topic to be removed from featured status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. As a general guide, new topics will remain on here for at least 14 days to allow for comment, and must have at least 4 remove votes (although consensus and lack of major objections are also important) for removal.

Contents


[edit] Topics nominated for removal

[edit] Final Fantasy titles


15 articles
Featured article Final Fantasy titles
Good article Final Fantasy
Good article Final Fantasy II
Article that has lost its good or featured article status Final Fantasy III
Featured article Final Fantasy IV
Good article Final Fantasy V
Featured article Final Fantasy VI
Article that has lost its good or featured article status Final Fantasy VII
Featured article Final Fantasy VIII (subtopic)
Featured article Final Fantasy IX
Featured article Final Fantasy X
Featured article Final Fantasy X-2
Featured article Final Fantasy XI
Featured article Final Fantasy XII
Good article Final Fantasy Mystic Quest

The grace period for this topic has ended, and not all of the articles are good (Final Fantasy III and Final Fantasy VII). -Xnux the Echidna 15:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment Sigh, what is there to say? FIII needs more references but there aren't that many for it, and FFVII was totally fixable but no one was interested. I supposed it will come back within a year, once it has some more work done to it. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Remove Each article covers a very large subject in itself, and information updates are regularly needed all over the series; perhaps this topic is simply too huge to be manageable for the time being. Featured (sub)topics might be a more realistic goal for these articles for now. The FFVIII subtopic has always managed to maintain its high quality. Once more subtopics are produced I believe this main topic will become more easily manageable. Kariteh (talk) 16:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
    • I don't think this is too huge to work. Once each games gets a GA or FA, demotions should be rare, and it isn't asking too much to get each new game in the main series up to GA when they are released every other year. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 17:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Remove This topic was already kept once because of Gerrymandering. Zginder 2008-06-10T18:15Z (UTC)
  • Remove. I'm sad to say it, but this topic does not currently meet the criteria. I do believe, however, it can be renominated quite quickly, and I'm planning on getting FFVII to at least GA status. When the next candidacy is up, I would like to see FFX-2 and Mystic Quest removed, as they are not part to the main series. The Prince (talk) 19:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Well, I don't think anyone is ever happy to vote for the removal of an FT... Kariteh (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
      • What's your point? The Prince (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
        • Just a little comment, as said in my edit summary. Kariteh (talk) 20:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Remove LuciferMorgan (talk) 11:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)