Wikipedia:Featured portal removal candidates/Portal:Vancouver
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed demotion from featured status of the Portal below. Please do not modify it. Additional comments should be made on the Portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal removal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of this discussion was Remove/De-list. Portal already de-listed, procedural closing. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 04:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Portal:Vancouver
As the nominator of this portal's successful featured status I find it even more difficult to fill out this candidate entry but I feel I cannot ignore what is so. This portal is no longer maintained nor as adequate content to be a featured portal at this time. I would say it fails almost every criteria point. Mkdwtalk 11:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Remove due to its current state.--cj | talk 12:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Remove per above, no longer updated. --Phoenix 17:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Remove Joe I 18:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Remove: Portal fails criteria. Happy editing, [sd] 17:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Remove. Can't believe there're red-links. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Relist Request. The WikiProject Vancouver is going to try and update its content. For the month of June its been updated. I request that you give us until the end of July to make your final decision on its featured status. Thanks. Mkdwtalk 21:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- Have you tried using random portal component? This way you don't have to update as much. I still stand on my previous viewpoint, remove. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, well the Quotes section since its introduction 3 months ago has rotated qutoes (about 11) every 2 mins. Does anyone have any suggestions where I may find quotes as I foresee problems trying to continuously source quotes about Vancouver to keep the section 'updated'? I will look into putting the Did you know into a rotation. Mkdwtalk 07:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Have you tried using random portal component? This way you don't have to update as much. I still stand on my previous viewpoint, remove. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Additional comments should be made on the Portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal removal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.