Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Water Buffalo

Support — Tomer T 13:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose — Nice quality but not a very interesting image on the whole aside from the exoticism of the animal, which is highly relative (a picture of a Jersey Cow might be exotic to someone in Thailand, but it is ho-hum to me). Lighting is a bit washed out, the animal is just standing there, the photo is just a front-on with little else going on in it and with no real depth of field. A good illustration of a water buffalo, but not an interesting photo beyond that. --Fastfission 15:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Weak support, It's a great photo of its subject, but the framing is too tight. —Pengo 01:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Weak oppose. Encyclopedic, but boring and not particularly sharp. It already is a quality image on the commons, but it's not FP material. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) (The Game) 11:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Weak oppose, tight framing anf the posture of the animal is suboptimal. I'd rather like to see the head in profile. --Dschwen 13:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Weak support angle isn't the best, but seems to be in an appropriate setting and detail seems to be high (took ages for the picture to load up). Terri G 16:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Good detail... But not very interesting. 8thstar 00:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Cluttered background and pose leave it unclear exactly what the animal looks like. Gaius Cornelius 23:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Not promoted MER-C 01:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)