Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Man masturbating

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not promoted -- WP:SNOW; this is Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, not MediaWiki:Bad image list. John254 03:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Man masturbating

Original - Man with shaved pubic hair masturbating by stimulating his erect penis with hand.
Original - Man with shaved pubic hair masturbating by stimulating his erect penis with hand.
Reason
A good quality image showing a man masturbating.
Articles this image appears in
Masturbation
Creator
User:Richiex in Wikimedia Commons
  • Support as nominator Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • ;_; Putting in hide box, don't anyone dare take it out. :D\=< (talk) 07:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong, strong oppose If there's an encyclopedic, highly technical way to illustrate masturbation, it's certainly not by taking a picture of yourself jacking it in your living room. Absolutely not FP material. SingCal 07:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
    • I don't think we need a "highly technical" illustration, but IMO the first-person perspective is very amateurish and not FP-worthy. If you want a FP of this, it's not going to be scientific or anything though, it's a pretty crude, simple act that doesn't exactly require clear explanation in the pic.. go for aesthetic appeal, and technical and compositional quality. :D\=< (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose Wow, just...wow... -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 09:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose. What can we do against this growing trend of men uploading penis pics? Sure, we need maybe half a dozen to illustrate the topic, but Wikipedia is not the place to show off your meat in this tasteless way. Samsara (FA • FP) 17:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy close This is getting rediculous. Juliancolton (Talk) 19:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy close for lack of enc relevance: much too small to illustrate properly the mechanics of onanism -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy close per the above. DurovaCharge! 20:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy close per above. Clegs (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose For the love of god, nominator, find some help for your perversions. -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 02:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)