Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Immortal Bridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Immortal Bridge

Original - "The Immortal Bridge," a rock formation on Mt. Tai, one of the Five Great Mountains of China.
Original - "The Immortal Bridge," a rock formation on Mt. Tai, one of the Five Great Mountains of China.
Observer Edit - Some minor adjustments bring out some of the potential of this image, still has issues such as motion blur due to camera shake but a step in the right direction
Observer Edit - Some minor adjustments bring out some of the potential of this image, still has issues such as motion blur due to camera shake but a step in the right direction
Reason
The focus of this picture is stunning, as the odds of it even existing are quite low.
Articles this image appears in
Mount Tai
Creator
Pfctdayelise
  • Support as nominator Axeman89 (talk) 03:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose Poor quality. And if you plan on demonstrating Mount Tai, shouldn't it be a picture of the mountain instead of this? crassic![talk] 11:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Not necessarily. You could illustrate disneyland by showing just the disney castle after all. As long as this illustrates a notable part of the mountain or is typical of the mountain, it has EV (I suspect the former). de Bivort 12:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose blown sky and chromatic abberation. de Bivort 12:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak support - I'd recommend you to nominate it on Commons instead. diego_pmc (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose The technical aspects are poor as mentioned above, and the composition could have been executed better. Lipton sale (talk) 18:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose But first, it is actually put into the article very appropriately illustrating a section of the article - it does not try to demonstrate the whole mountain. The subject could however do with better treatment - the faded distance weakens it, the matt colouring dullens it and for an illustration of angularity, it lacks sharpness. Motmit (talk) 20:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose I have no problem with the article placement or composition. However, the quality is unacceptable. Sorry.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 23:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose original poor contrast, blown highlights, see example for how there is room for improvement Capital photographer (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Nice work Cap! a bit off technical jiggery pokery makes a significant difference here Motmit (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Very weak oppose. Excelent subject matter, but unfortunately, not so good a picture. Spinach Dip 02:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Not promoted MER-C 05:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)