Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rose Geranium.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Pelargonium graveolens

Original - Pelargonium graveolens.
Original - Pelargonium graveolens.
Reason
High resolution photograph of Pelargonium graveolens(Rose Geranium).
Articles this image appears in
Pelargonium graveolens
Creator
Laitche
  • Support as nominator -- Laitche (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Sharp focus, nice composure, no noise. Also depicts its subject well. Sam Barsoom 20:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Very sharp. Shooting it from the side may have been more enc than head-on, because the lengths of the structures are more clearly visible.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 22:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Excellent macro, and pleasing composition. Can't fault it. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Wonderful macro, crisp subject, vivid colours, pleasing composition and smooth diffused background. Capital photographer (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Ooooo, look at that bokeh! Creamy. Great shot. -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 04:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose Subject takes up too small a portion of the picture. It would be far better if the picture was centered. EgraS (talk) 06:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Why would you make assumptions about one persons photography (or if they even partake in photography) based on their preference for a center composition for encyclopedia illustrations? I also prefer that encyclopedia illustrations have non-artistic compositions with limited negative space, does that make me a bad photographer? Cacophony (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support per Capital photographer. crassic![talk] 02:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Beautiful, encyclopedic, and high quality. NauticaShades 01:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Very nice picture. I like the vivid colour. SpencerT♦C 18:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Promoted Image:Rose Geranium.jpg MER-C 12:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)