Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Explosions!!!

Used in: Grenavitar, Grenavitar,
Reason: The STUNNING image CLEARLY meets the criteria for a featured sound, including the fact that it's loud and annoyingly boom-like, Exceptional size and detail, as well as that "wow" factor required of ALL featured pictures, not like those ridiculous ONION FRUIT shots...

I ~~think~~know it meets all the criteria:

Definitely high quality; I mean seriously here people! Who takes the time to take a picture when they're being shot at!? That DEFINITELY qualifies it for those special circumstances as well. Clearly.
It's HUGE! Just look at the thing! It's larger than a flopppy disk! And put it up on a projector and you've got an even BIGGER explosino!!!!111 Tha'ts like...l1000! pixels of explosions! Plus it would have exploded out of the frame if the shot was any bigger.
Definitely the best work. I need not never ever say more. It's a shot of a shot.
Look at that beautifl public domain license...shiney...a licence to kill
SCARES THE READER INTO SUBMISSION WHEN THEY SEE THIS PICTURE THEY WILL NOT HAVE TO READ THE ARTICLE BECAUESE THEY WILL KNOW THAT FIREBALLS ARE HUGE!!! itS LIKE AN ARTICLE IN ITSELF!
ACCURATE ENOUGH TO HIT ITS TARGET!
Ok I admit it's not really "pleasing to the eye", but then again, neither is Fonzo
It did have a good caption. Until it was destroyed. That's just the effect the picture has on things.
Oh yeah, it's neutral. What's more neutral than a fireball? So cute...

Plus, the other "bad images" aren't fireballs, so it's not a bad one.
What more could you ask for in a FRIGGIN FEATURED PICTURE?! Put your support in now, before time runs out!

Articles this image appears in: Explosion, of course! Probably in fire and pinpoint accuracy of astouning proportions too, but who honestly checks these things?
Creator: Good question...

Exploding Support as nominator!!!`11~~@@!!! — Tewy 01:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Support. MER-C 01:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Check the date.
Oh dear... --KFP (talk | contribs) 01:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
5UPP0R7!!! all twelve deleted edits!!! The must've been awesome since they all went BUST!!! ~ trialsanderrors 01:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC) !!!
Support Kind of small, but still good. Has been nominated before.--Here T oHelp 01:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
EXTREME Support, but... what the hell? 8thstar 02:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
COMMENT!!! Can someone please fill me in?!? What the heck is happening? This nomination also doesn't make sense. Did Jimbo do so something I'm not aware of?!? =? Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 05:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, Jimbo inverted time. ~ trialsanderrors 06:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  - Thanks for the heads-up...it's still 11:30 here. Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 06:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
    - See? Such is the awesome power Jimbo has over time. ~ trialsanderrors 06:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
      - Tricky tricky. No one is safe now. Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 07:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
        
        Is this for indenting? 11:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)11:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment, the fire ball on the left has good height. The one on the right has good color. You need to fix the fireball in the middle for support. gren グレン 11:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Added to article to make nomination work gren グレン 11:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment No, the fireball on the right has a colour which should go on the tall fireball on the left, and if the fireball on the right was hightened slightly, or there were more fireballs, then it would be better and I would support. There needs to be at least seven fireballs on the image to be clear. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 11:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

O RLY? —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 13:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Support - yes, and I smoked a sweet potato with Tupac Shakur at the top of Machu Picchu last night. No really. See all that smoke? Living evidence. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 13:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Support and the brain slug agrees.--Svetovid 15:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Support This picture was taken at an opportune moment, and really leaves me in awe of the power of man. But is there a caption other than the one shown here?
Extreme support: I like things that burn. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 18:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I would support, except I died in the blast. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak Oppose Great photo; not sure if this is really Wikipedia's best work. Someone should fix the caption (as much as it is funny). If I could decide, this would very barely be FP. --Gabycs 00:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Closed, it's April 3rd now, move along --Dschwen 12:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)