Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/European Parliament delist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] European Parliament
Composition isn't bad but the image quality is pretty poor - oversaturated, oversharpened and heavily shadow/highlighted, with significant artifacts particularly in the trees and around the sculler. The building isn't going anywhere, so there's not really any excuse for featuring a picture of this quality.
- Nominate for delisting --YFB ¿ 18:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delist, the oversharpening is horrific. If you look at the original you can see why -- it was blurry to start. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have to admit that the digital version is not a really good quality. Last time I had to face the fact that automatically digitized slides could not compete with images done with digicams. Today I would not put the image on the FPC list any more Andreas Tille, author
- Keep Well, it has mostly good quality. And it is significant. Sharkface217 19:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Go today and make a comparable photo (and no, I would not use this as an argument to keep a photo with technical constraints in FP). Andreas Tille, author
- Delist artificial sharpening reduces effective resolution and damages appearance, you cannot get information that is not there, this is not CSI. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 23:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delist Way oversharpened, low quality, etc... Inklein 02:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep All I need to say.... Booksworm Talk to me! 15:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --KFP (talk | contribs) 18:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delist and get another shot of it. Witty lama 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delist for reasons stated by nom. --Bridgecross 20:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Delisted Raven4x4x 05:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
