Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Carbon cycle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Carbon cycle

Diagram of the carbon cycle. The black numbers indicate how much carbon is stored in various reservoirs (in billions of tons). The blue numbers indicate how much carbon moves between reservoirs each year.
Diagram of the carbon cycle. The black numbers indicate how much carbon is stored in various reservoirs (in billions of tons). The blue numbers indicate how much carbon moves between reservoirs each year.

The actual image filename is a bit dodgy, but the diagram itself is clear, useful and attractive. The fullsize framed version (so that the text is legible) illustrates carbon cycle. It originally came from a NASA publication. - Solipsist 21:37, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Nominate and support. - Solipsist 21:37, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Clear and to the point. Denni☯ 03:20, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Very small. Perhaps someone with vector skills and a bit of spare time could trace this? ed g2s • talk 04:02, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - beautifully drawn. It may be small but I can read everything on it easily - Adrian Pingstone 08:05, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose for now. It's not clear to me what the 1.6 and 0.5 numbers represent. Also, it could do with some more explanation on the image page. Otherwise, nice and colorful diagram. Junes 09:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I rewrote the title on the image page in an effort to make the importance of this diagram clearer. Janderk 20:07, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support, it's large enough to read. Mgm|(talk) 09:23, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Nice, but should be in higher resolution and with an SVG source provided. What ed g2s said. Fredrik | talk 13:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Good looking and very important diagram showing how humanity disturbes the Earth's fragile equilibrium. Janderk 20:05, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Should be higer res, not especially interesting. --Fir0002 10:04, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Aliasing problems along the lower right border, and the text is far from crisp. Higher res would be nice too. —Korath (Talk) 11:09, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Nothing special about it. Too low resolution. Jonas Olson 21:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Not promoted +5 / -6 -- Solipsist 06:16, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)