Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Canon EOS 350D front
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Canon EOS 350D front
.jpg/180px-Canon_EOS_350D_front_(aka).jpg)
_edit.jpg/180px-Canon_EOS_350D_front_(aka)_edit.jpg)
I really like the quality and the fact that it shows a good angle of this type of Canon camera, with a background that complements the subject; appears in Canon EOS 350D, and Aka created the image.
- Nominate and support. - Tewy 22:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose: Not unique enough. One could get a similar image from the Canon website. --Nebular110 02:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)- Oppose. A better depiction of the lens than the camera, though it's difficult to tell from the picture alone which models of camera or lens are depicted. Oversharpened. -- moondigger 02:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- What's wrong with "Canon EOS 350D digital single-lens reflex camera with a Tamron 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD lens"? -- Aka 06:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- If the image is meant to be illustrative of a particular camera body (i.e., encyclopedic), then the viewing angle and mounted accessories are big considerations. The only indication we have that this is a 350D is the caption. We can't see a significant portion of the front of the camera (including the model designation) due to the mounted lens, which is more prominent in the image than the camera body. Most of the controls are not visible. Without the caption, all we can really tell is that this is a Canon SLR with a lens mounted, not that it's a 350D. It's not a bad image, but even if it wasn't oversharpened, it's not encyclopedic. -- moondigger 13:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- OK, but you cannot have all at once ;) You cannot show the camera from all sides and with and without a lens within one picture. And there is one more image from the back part of the camera. -- Aka 13:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- If the image is meant to be illustrative of a particular camera body (i.e., encyclopedic), then the viewing angle and mounted accessories are big considerations. The only indication we have that this is a 350D is the caption. We can't see a significant portion of the front of the camera (including the model designation) due to the mounted lens, which is more prominent in the image than the camera body. Most of the controls are not visible. Without the caption, all we can really tell is that this is a Canon SLR with a lens mounted, not that it's a 350D. It's not a bad image, but even if it wasn't oversharpened, it's not encyclopedic. -- moondigger 13:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- What's wrong with "Canon EOS 350D digital single-lens reflex camera with a Tamron 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD lens"? -- Aka 06:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- You didn't have to remove the nomination. You could have waited for more opinions. I gave my opinion, but that doesn't mean others wouldn't disagree with me. -- moondigger 14:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Closed - Not Promoted Withdrawn by image creator. -Ravedave 17:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
