Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/January 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

edit2005
June 13 promoted 10 failed
July 20 promoted 8 failed
August 14 promoted 9 failed
September 3 promoted 8 failed
October 7 promoted 2 failed
November 7 promoted 6 failed 1 removed
December 6 promoted 4 failed
2006
January 11 promoted 11 failed 1 removed
February 3 promoted 8 failed 1 kept
March 13 promoted 11 failed 2 kept
April 10 promoted 5 failed 1 removed
May 10 promoted 7 failed 1 kept
June 9 promoted 10 failed
July 10 promoted 9 failed 1 kept
August 10 promoted 7 failed 1 kept
September 5 promoted 7 failed
October 8 promoted 10 failed 1 removed
November 11 promoted 8 failed 2 kept
December 20 promoted 11 failed
2007
January 18 promoted 11 failed
February 11 promoted 11 failed
March 12 promoted 10 failed 1 kept
April 20 promoted 17 failed 1 kept
May 23 promoted 14 failed
June 22 promoted 9 failed 1 kept
July 29 promoted 20 failed 2 kept/1 removed
August 41 promoted 15 failed 3 removed
September 42 promoted 11 failed 1 kept/1 removed
October 43 promoted 17 failed 2 kept
November 40 promoted 18 failed
December 38 promoted 15 failed 2 removed
2008
January 46 promoted 18 failed 6 removed
February 34 promoted 16 failed 10 removed/3 kept
March 65 promoted 9 failed 4 removed/2 kept
April 48 promoted 25 failed 2 removed/2 kept
May 50 promoted 39 failed 1 removed
June 10 promoted 9 failed

Contents

[edit] Sri Lankan national cricket captains

No longer a Featured list

Promoted June 2005. It is not a featured list for these reasons: There are 59 total links. Of those, 25 are red links. That is over 42 percent. That is too many. In addition, almost all of those red links are in latter sections of this list. The lack of a women’s under-19 team seems to imply that it doesn’t exist. Is this true? Some sections have not been updated. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 21:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Demote as we did with Indian national cricket captains following pretty much the same reasoning. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 02:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove - I agree, it no longer meets the standards as they have evolved. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)