Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Simpsons (season 4)

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 21:42, 23 February 2008.

[edit] The Simpsons (season 4)

This time, I've got another season of The Simpsons. I will address any concerns brought up. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 19:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Support - now all my comments have been (rapidly and accurately) addressed. Good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

• Support Good job, only a few comments that hardly pass as concerns:
  • The lead uses "show runner" while "showrunner" is used several times below. Y Done
  • Al Jean and Mike Reiss, who had also ran the previous season... Who had also run? Y Done
  • Several sentences in the Development section deal with crew leaving, but the tense changes to present briefly when mentioning David M Stern and Jon Vitti. Y Done
  • "Treehouse of Horror III" was nominated for Emmys for... How about "nominated for Emmys in the categories of"?
  • Should "the Ayn Rand school of tots" be capitalised? Y Done
  • "...eventually Homer becomes injured" sounds a little... weird. If you're in a brawl, you don't usually "become injured". How about "Homer is injured" or something less, um, accidental? Y Done
  • "Springfiedians"? You'd know better than me, but I seem to recall them referred to in other episodes as "Springfielders". But again, I'd trust you on that one. Y Done
• Good stuff, and I hope the comments are useful. :) •97198 talk 06:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Oh, and the DVD release dates appear as "Region 1 on 15 June 2004, Region 2 on 2 August, 2004 and in Region 4 on 25 August, 2004" - the latter two with commas - because some setting defaults to no-comma if the year's linked. Is that just my settings, or is it universal? •97198 talk 06:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure. Anyway, your concerns have been addressed. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 15:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Coolies, thanks :) And that date thing is a little weird - who knows. •97198 talk 00:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Conditional support
  • It's only a minor one, but I think the table headers would be better in white text, rather than black against the dark blue. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 21:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
    • I switched it to a lighter colour of blue. Is it better now? -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 03:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

It is better, but it's not great. I dunno, maybe it's my eyes, but I still think

-- Matthew | talk | Contribs 05:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

• Support. An exemplary list. great work, Scorpion0422. Qst (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.