Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Pearl Jam discography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Pearl Jam discography

I am nominating the discography because I believe it meets the criteria to be a Featured List. A lot of work has gone in to the article and I believe it to be complete and well-referenced. If there are any issues I will make sure to address them.-5- (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • "9.5 million + (US)[21]" – What's the + for? "More than 9.5 million?" Just put 9.5 million since that would be the maximum that has been verified; this goes for all of them.

Gary King (talk) 04:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Support I copy-edited the lead and cleaned up anything I could find a while back. This is great work by -5-, just like his effort with all Pearl Jam-related articles. I just have two questions for the reviewers as I'm unclear what MOS:DISCOG has to say about them:

  • Should Tribute albums be included in a band's discography (since its technically not by the band)?
  • Is it alright to list the total number of live albums including the official bootlegs in the template or should just the major Live albums be counted there (ie, 6)? indopug (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments Looks really really good! I only have a couple minor suggestions:

Resolved stuff from Drewcifer
  • The dash in "rearviewmirror: Greatest Hits 1991-2003" should be an en-dash (–) not a hyphen (-).
  • Why is are tracks that were never released as a single in the singles table?
  • This also relates to the singles tallies in the lead and infobox. If they aren't actually singles, they probably shouldn't be mentioned in the tallies of singles, right? Maybe you could just move those to a different table? I've never come across a situation like this, so I don't know if I have the perfect solution, but as it is it's kind of confusing.
  • At one time it looked like this. Perhaps we could try it this way again?-5- (talk) 21:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
  • In citation #14, All Music Guide is now Allmusic. And it should be wikilinked at least in the first citation.
  • Same with #35.
  • I'm not sure what "Accreditations. aria.com.au." is doing in citation#25.
  • Citation #30 needs to be formatted properly. Drewcifer (talk) 16:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
    1. 30's publisher value doesn't match #9, #31, and #32. ("Billboard.com") And some are wikilinked some aren't.
  • "with Irons being replaced by former Matt Cameron" what does former mean here?
  • There's not need for the two hearers in the single chart column in the Videos table. Drewcifer (talk) 21:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)