The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 12 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Scorpion0422 22:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Support — I've added symbols to the coloured fields so readers who can't distinguish colour for reason X, Y, or Z can read it easier. Otherwise, great job! Maxim(talk)(contributions) 14:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Support Looks good to go. Circeus 05:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Conditional support: I'd prefer to see the "Notes", "General references", and "Specific references" pulled together in to one section - otherwise that section of the page looks a bit messy (IMHO). -- SatyrTN(talk | contribs) 15:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I like to try to keep notes and references seperate. -- Scorpion0422 16:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I think it's okay as long as we don't get 3 or 4 headers to account for the whole thing. Circeus 16:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Support - Well written, and informative. The pictures are a big plus, as well. BsroiaadnLet's Go Devils! 17:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)