Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Maroon 5 discography

• Kara's Flowers should be wikilinked
• In the sentence with all the band member's names, I'd recommend trying to get rid of the stuff in parenthesis by saying "on drums" or "playing drums" or something like that. 4 parenthesis in the same sentence is a little distracting. Same thing with the slash in "lead vocals/guitar". There's also an extra "lead".
• "which failed to sell well commercially" is somewhat POV. Could you reword it to "which failed to chart." or something like that?
• "The band left their record label in order to explore other musical styles." Kind if a sentence fragment.
• "Their debut single "Harder to Breathe", released in 2003, slowly gained airplay, which helped propel the album into the top 20 of the Billboard 200." Somewhat awkward, mainly because of all the commas.
• "a short live album" "short" is unnecessary here, as well as being relative.
• In the lead and Other albums table "Live – Friday the 13th" uses the wrong dash.
• Is it really important to the topic that their live album was of a performance in Santa Barbara? Consider the broader topic at hand (their overall body of work, not necessarily the details of this single release).
• Not really sure why the Notes columns have small font.
• Similar notes should probably be kept together (ie the sale should probably be mentioned one after the other, then certifications.
• If data isn't available, don't bother putting "n/a".
• Multi platinum multipliers should be "×" not an "x".
• What the heck is a "Point"?
• The dashes aren't necessary in the certification column (and maybe the point column?)
• The upcoming single shouldn't have "TBA" for the charts. Since the single hasn't been released yet, just leave it blank.
• Allmusic should be wikilinked in citation #1. Drewcifer (talk) 08:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
• B-Sides are generally discorouged in discogs. This is a discography, not a songography.
• MVDBase isn't a reliable source. It's usually ok to leave directors columns unreferenced, since the video itself acts as its own reference.
• Discogs is also not a reliable source.

• I've adressed your comments and fixed them in the list, but I have questions for some.
• The points are directly sourced from the United World Chart. There's an explanation about what it is and how its calculated over here: United World Chart#Track Chart. Should I make a link to it or something? IMO, the points are quite useful.
• Has there been a consensus about B-Sides? I notice a number of FL discos have B-Sides, so I'm not sure if they should be deleted. Is there a guideline? I notice Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies/style but it's not yet a guideline.
• I don't really agree that the video itself acts as its own source. I'll try to find other news sources to compensate for the MVDbase source. RaNdOm26 (talk) 10:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Cool. To repond to your comments above:

• The B-sides thing is not official yet, but I think there's a growing consensus against them. The FL discogs that do have them are fairly old, and will probably need to be cleaned up when and if the guidline becomes official. So, at the moment I'm just suggesting it based on what seems to be an ongoing trend.
• The points thing still confuses me. A wikilink would be nice, but the UWC page doesn't really help much. Do you think you could redo that section a little bit to make it clearer? I know that's not actually part of this list, but it would be helpful.
• The music videos sourcing themselves is mainly because most music videos have the credits on them. Much like we don't need to source who performed on an album or who acted in a movie. But hey, it never hurts to add sources, so if you can find something reliable go ahead and add it.

Also, I have a few more suggestions:

• U.S. or US. Stay consistent.
• "and attended college to explore many musical styles." seems somewhat irrelevant (at leas the many musical styles part).
• Citatrion #20 has an errant =. Drewcifer (talk) 11:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

• I've addressed your new concerns, although the first seems to have already been taken care of. Lara❤Love 13:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

• Alright. I've gone and removed the MVDbase source, and add many reliable sources for the music video directors. Apparently, all the discogs sources and B-sides are now gone. I've made a little adjustment at the UWC page regarding points, hopefully making it a little clearer. So far, everything's done. :) RaNdOm26 (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Definitely looking better. Few more things I've noticed:

• The charts should be in the following order: home country, other countries by alphabetical order, world-wide. see WP:CHARTS.
  • Comment: How do I deal with European Hot 100 Singles Chart and United World Chart, which are not country charts? RaNdOm26 (talk) 10:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
    • I'm not entirely sure, WP:CHARTS doesn't cover that, but I think what you did (put them at the end) is best. But just to make sure, I posted a topic at WP:CHARTS's talk page. Drewcifer (talk) 11:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• There's some pretty random italicizations in the citations. MAgazines should be ital, but not website names.
• I think "Points" should be wikilinked in the column, in the same way certifications is linked.
• Certifications shouldn't have a dash, just leave them blank. ("Sunday Morning")
• Numbers like "8 million" should have an   between 8 and million.
  • Actually, so should things like "5x platinum".
• The date in the infobox should be American style. Drewcifer (talk) 09:29, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for this. A point though: the website names are italicised is because they are in the "Work" parameter in {{cite web}} as opposed to the "Publisher" parameter, but I'll change them to "Publisher" to remove the italics. RaNdOm26 (talk) 09:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Looking good. Few more minor things I noticed:

• All Music Guide is now Allmusic. And citation #7 should be fixed to be consistent with the other cases of the same website.
• I have to agree with indopug, the points thing just isn't doing it for me. Like indopug pointed out, it applies to only one chart, and I still find it confusing. I still have no idea what it means, to be honest, and the wikilink was only a little helpful. Drewcifer (talk) 22:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)