Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of cetaceans

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 6 support, 0 oppose. Promote. MarcK 00:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a list of all the known extant cetaceans including images and distribution data. It is based mainly on several of the other animal featured lists that exist. Chris_huh^talk 12:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• Looks like ref 35 needs {{cite web}}. -- Phoenix2 ^(holla) 01:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • YDone. Cite web added. Chris_huh^talk 09:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Support, good. -- Phoenix2 ^(holla) 20:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Nominating this one has been on my "to do list" for a while. Great work. Rmhermen 02:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Looks excellent. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 14:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I really like those size comparison diagrams.--Pharos 17:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Excellent list. yup those size comparisons are very useful and great. DSachan 18:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Conditional support: I really don't think it necessary to link to List of whale species and List of dolphin species so many times. Just once in See also should be enough. After all, Everything in these lists will already be in this article... Circeus 04:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It was originally like that but in a peer review it had a while ago i was asked to change it. I think your way is better though. Like i said in the peer review since 'whale' is a monophyletic term it makes it more confusing having them linked like this. I will change it back. Chris_huh^talk 10:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
    • YDone. I have now done that.Chris_huh^talk 10:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
      • I suspectit's the sort of things about an article that tend to go back and forth... Circeus 16:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)