Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Gillingham F.C. seasons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Gillingham F.C. seasons
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 7 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Scorpion0422 19:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Another list based on the ever-popular football club seasons format - please let me know if anything needs amending or correcting.
Cheers!!!
ChrisTheDude 10:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- I think additional research should be done for the top scorers from Gillingham's seasons outside the Football League.
- Maybe the empty fields in 'League Cup' and 'Other competitions' can be coloured or maybe the cells can be removed?
- I think the divisions in the table should be wikilinked. –
Ilse@ 17:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Support Good work. Per above it'd be a good idea to wikilink the first instance of each new league but I understand how difficult it can be to find early days and non-league scorers so not expecting much there. Also don't feel there's a need to change the format of the table. The Rambling Man 19:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Just to confirm, I have every book published to date on the Gills' history and none list the top scorers from those seasons, nor do soccerbase or allfootballers.com, beyond that I don't know what additional research could be done....... ChrisTheDude 20:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Supportcool--Mini@ 08:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment A few minor comments.
- For seasons, I'd write "in the xxxx-xx season" instead of just "in xxxx-xx".
- Full stops needed for the sentences starting "No competitive football...".
Not much, as you can see. Mattythewhite 20:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support Good work. Mattythewhite 11:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support I participated at peer review; the editor dealt with issues raised promptly, either by making changes requested or by explaining why changes would/could not be made. Only thing I've spotted since, the note in the 1921 position column about no relegation should go against 1929 as well. Well done. Struway2 13:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- I've added the reference to 1929 as pointed out ChrisTheDude 21:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support I have given the Lead a very small copyedit. Other than that, like the other reviewers, I can't find any flaws with this list. It follows the Footy format, seems comprehensive and accurate. Meets all the criteria. Well done. Woodym555 14:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support I can't find any faults. Great work. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 18:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)