The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Very old FA. Fails criterion 1b and 1c, since it is quite short and has no inline citations. --Peter Andersen 18:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
A huge portion of the article was removed by a vandal about a month ago. That should take care of the shortness problem... --- RockMFR 19:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Suggested FA criteria concerns are comprehensiveness (1b) and citations (1c).Marskell 13:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Remove Only one edit in over a month. Still no inline citations. DrKiernan 14:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 23:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Remove no citations. Jay32183 03:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.