The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I worked on this a lot quite some time ago, but it has not been maintained. There are short sections, sections without citations, and personally I now feel it no longer fits the FA criteria. — Wackymacs (talk) 06:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Suggested FA criteria concerns are stub sections (4) and citations (1c).Marskell (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delist lacks citations, half the citations are from a site where the author has a dislaimer saying that he is an amateur enthusiast. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Remove. Per Blnguyen, sadly. Ceoil (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.