Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Rock, Paper, Scissors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Rock, Paper, Scissors

Article is no longer a featured article.

No references is the real reason this has to be removed. It has a few external links, but many, many unverified statements, most of which I suspect may be unverifiable. I'm not satisified with its completeness or brilliant prose either, but the first objection should suffice. Sorry to see this go: I love the game, but we aren't fooling anyone with the FA tag. Passed a few years ago, would likely not even meet GA muster today. savidan(talk) (e@) 16:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Hold the press, folks. I just assumed you were right, but the article does have several references. There are though still quite a few other problems, so remove. - Taxman Talk 16:39, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove, as per nomination. --Ragib 18:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove per nom; may have been an FA years ago when it was promoted, but certainly not one today. Although not a requirement for FA status, I would like to see more inline referencing. joturner 13:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove as per nomination. Also, this one's badly formatted, inconsistent in wikimarkup and looks ugly (not that it's a thing that can't be quickly fixed). The very organization, ordering and segmentation are badly done and a major cleanup is required. I wouldn't even name this a good or even fairly OK article in its current state. → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov 17:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove per nom. Páll (Die pienk olifant) 00:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove Tobyk777 04:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove, fails FA criteria (lacks inline ciatations). --Terence Ong 03:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Note that inline citations are not required. Referencing is all that is required. joturner 01:52, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove. Per nom.Hezzy 20:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)