Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Amazing Race/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 18:01, 19 June 2007.

[edit] The Amazing Race

This article is well written, of decent length, and a decent amount of references. There are not many factual errors, and the article is very informative. (lemonflash)^talk 01:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. Most the images are fair-use only and they don't have fair-use rationale. The detour, roadblock, (and other similar images) all seem to be used for decorative purposes only. I haven't read the text so I can't comment on that, but the image issues need to be corrected. Pepsidrinka 12:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment it certainly seems to cover all the bases. The low number of cites in some sections does concern me slightly. There is also a lot of listing which might be suitable for conversion into prose? Also, has it actually had a peer review? A link to it on this FAC would be useful if one exists. SGGH ^speak! 12:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose: All images need to have fair use rationales written for them. Also, many sections are unreferenced. -- Underneath-it-All 00:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.