Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/St Michael's Mount/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 16:57, 28 June 2007.

[edit] St Michael's Mount

Peer Reviewed, several nice photos. Was included in the previous CDROM edition to Wikipedia. Llamabr 14:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose Sorry, but I've left a message on your talk page. DrKiernan 14:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per DrKiernan: It is a fairly good article but the lack of references makes it an insta-fail. Add some inline citations and you'll be good to go. --tennisman 13:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. -- Underneath-it-All 03:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose sorry, lack of inline refs plus may lack comprehensiveness. Check out some of the detail on successful FAs - how many people live on it? It seems pretty green; is this a garden, private or public, native reserve...etc. On the plus side, shouldn't be too long to get to FA, I just don't think it will happen this time 'round cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.