Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Monte Ne/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 03:52, 21 April 2007.
[edit] Monte Ne
Since it's last nomination this article has been throughly copy edited, and better referenced. It should now meet all the required criteria for a featured article. --The_stuart 16:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Insufficient inline citations. There are whole sections without a reference. Notes and references improperly formatted. Good work so far, but it still needs some work. JHMM13 03:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. For an FA-quality article of that size, I'd include around 70-80 inline citations. Also, please properly use cite templates to format citations in a consistent manner. "Beautiful Monte Ne" is a very short and useless section, consider merging it somewhere in the history. Todor→Bozhinov 20:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Beautiful Monte Ne moved --The_stuart 16:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's not so much about matching a quota for the number of inline citations as it is the complete verifiability of the material presented in the article. Typically speaking, if you are making some sort of claim that isn't overwhelmingly obvious, it needs to have a source. Whatever the amount of inline citations you end up having depends on how many you need in an article. It's best to look at recently-made FAs to get an idea for this. JHMM13 17:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
