Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Louis Lambert (novel)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 15:26, 26 May 2008 [1].

[edit] Louis Lambert (novel)

I'm self-nominating this article because I have spent many long weeks toiling over it, poring over many books by and about Honoré de Balzac. Many thanks to Outriggr and Awadewit, who provided helpful (and kind) feedback at the peer review. Thanks in advance for having a look. – Scartol • Tok 01:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Support—participated in peer review. It's pristine! –Outriggr § 03:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments - Sources look fine, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 11:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Support As a recent peer reviewer, I already found few improvements to suggest. A wonderfully engaging article that is well-researched. Thanks for all your hard work on improving Balzac-related articles, Scartol! Should we start calling you are our French literature expert? :) Awadewit (talk) 15:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • No, you should call me our English language expert, because I know the difference between "our" and "are", and I proofread! (Ooh boy, I am gonna get it for this one.) Seriously, though, thanks again for your careful reviews, the both of ya. – Scartol • Tok 15:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Too funny! My students' writing is infiltrating my own! Ah! Awadewit (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support as the GA reviewer who recommended it be taken here, I have no concerns and fully believe the article meets FA criteria. --Kakofonous (talk) 21:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support: I missed the PR lovefest due to lack of time, but I doubt I would have had anything constructive to say. This is another jewel from Scartol. Balzac still goes right over my head, but I'm nonetheless impressed with the time and energy put into his articles. Well written, correct formatting, exemplary sources, etc, etc. Great work, as always. María (habla conmigo) 15:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.