Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lisa Gerrard/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 17:10, 24 September 2007.

[edit] Lisa Gerrard

I nominate Lisa Gerrard because everyone should know how talanted this woman really is.--ineversigninsodonotmessageme

Comment I'm afraid that both this and Contralto (and you should really only nominate one at a time) are both going to need expansion and improvement (particularly references) to make FA. If you're interested in improving them, you could try a WP:Peer review. If you do set up a peer review, let me know and I'll comment. J.Winklethorpe ^talk 09:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy remove this is way too short and underreferenced. Much work is needed. Reads more like a film history. Too listy.Sumoeagle179 15:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong oppose. It's ranked as a "Start" article. Meaning it's not even close to featured status. --RandomOrca2 02:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball Oppose. Could someone please make it clear at the top of this page that pages nominated here must meet the criteria? --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 16:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.