Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hybrid Theory/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 03:01, 26 November 2007.
[edit] Hybrid Theory
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it's gone through some huge improvements contributed by me and SouperAwesome. I recently put for peer review here. I think it passes all the FA criteria. But I think desperately, that it is in need of a thorough copy editing. So, tell me what you think. Thanks! (SUDUSER)85 06:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support As nominator (SUDUSER)85 06:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, the article needs copy-editing. Desperately. --Kaypoh (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Suffers from POV -
- "proved to be a commercial success"
- "Critically acclaimed internationally" - yet we have critics panning it in the reception section?
- "Four hit singles were released" i listened to this band back in 2001 and the only 'hit' was "In the End"
- "The success of the album made it a bestseller during the time of its release" you already told us it was the best selling debut album
- years alone such as 1996 should be delinked
- He then sent the tapes back to Blue by FedEx[6] Blue was impressed - missing fullstop?
- the band renamed themselves as Hybrid Theory after Bennington was included, - in the line-up?
- The Whisky[9] - end of the paragraph and no fullstop?
- Linkin Park
hadproduced a nine-track demo tape - and
alsoplayed forty-two - lasted four weeks that were spent re-recording the songs off of the demo tape - off of is not well written, remove 'of'
- , isolation[14] and also disappointments and aftermath feelings of failed relationships.[15] Remove "and also" and add a comma
- Four singles off
ofthe album - All Music Guide should be in italics
M3tal H3ad (talk) 08:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Y Done All issues addressed by M3tal H3ad have been corrected. (SUDUSER)85 05:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Quite informative with the issues above being fixed. But is there any info on art cover avaliable? --Brand спойт 18:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.