Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Gothic architecture/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 01:38, 29 September 2007.

[edit] Gothic architecture

Stable article, written by architectural historians and further editted by specialists in particular fields of history and architecture. Amandajm 05:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Based on a quick read, the same citation issues as in Renaissance architecture—insufficient citations, full citations not given where used, page numbers not given. J.Winklethorpe ^talk 23:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment:You seem to have nominated a lot of pages recently claiming they are written by architectural or art historians. I find this concerning as I see no well known architectural historians in the history. Bearing in mind that Wikipedia has to be beyond reproach in its claims - I would like to know who these people are and their proven qualifications (or list of publications) to be so termed. If these facts are not available I don't think the claim of qualified authorship should be made. I have commented in full on only one of your nominations as I feel you should concentrate on one page at a time. Multiple nominations are discouraged. Giano 13:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.