Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flower/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Flower

This article meets all of the requirments worthy of being a featured article. Neutral, well written, pictures balance the article very well, etc. Veracious Rey talk ↔ contribs 13:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Oppose This article isn't ready. It needs inline citations per What is a featured article. This line "Several other symbols are used that will have to await drawings to illustrate here (see [1])." is innappropriate, as is the Floristry section which says "Under Construction". Articles shouldn't contain notes to readers like that. The lead section is well written as is Pollination. James086Talk | Contribs 14:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Very strong object per James. These problems (which I almost didn't believe when I read James's comment) are inexcusable. -- Kicking222 15:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
If I may add, this is not even remotely close to a Good Article (per WP:WIAGA), much less an FA. -- Kicking222 15:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • The nominator has withdrawn their nomination per this edit. Picaroon 05:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)