Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flag of Australia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Flag of Australia
Comprehensive article on the flag of Australia, with multiple contributors, on par with other featured flags. Comments welcome.--nixie 04:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Appears to be adequate.
- The above unsigned voted was added by User:Fifelfoo at 05:12 on January 24. Andrew Levine 05:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Very good article in line with the recently promoted Flag of Mexico. One thing more I would like to see, under the Protocol section, is what the recommended way to salute the flag is (if any). Andrew Levine 05:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- [1] says that all should face the flag, no hand salute is given unless a person is wearing a uniform. Head-gear should also be removed too. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) Fair use policy 06:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Good reading and informative throughout, well done. A minor comment, the last paragraph of the Other Australian flags section could probably do with a little information or even a link as to how those flags are officially recognised, given that the article puts some emphasis on the flags act. --darkliighttalk 06:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, meets the criteria.--cj | talk 08:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Well done, great work. —Nightstallion (?) 09:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Let's hope it gets FA in time for Australia Day! - Gt 11:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. This looks great and kudos to the major authors of the article. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) Fair use policy 14:29, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Well done, Aussies. We poms must get the Union Flag sorted out. -- ALoan (Talk) 15:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Nice and well written. —BrianSmithson 03:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Well done. Forever young 10:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Nicely done. Australia's pride in flag form as a well-done article! Uncke Herb 10:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Interesting reading and a great article. -- Ian ≡ talk 13:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - well written, well referenced, comprehensive. Rossrs 14:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, good charts with explanations, interesting history section. Brandmeister 15:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment and weak support: I notice that the National Flag Day and Centenary Flag sections are painfully short. Could they be added to the "history" section, or better yet, expanded (probably not). Thank you. --Trevdna 16:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Painfully short is a bit of an overstatement. There really isn't much information about these subjects, but they both warrant mention and are distinct topics from the history of the flag.--nixie 22:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, well done! :) - Mailer Diablo 18:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Yes! KILO-LIMA 18:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC)