Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dawson's Creek (old)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Dawson's Creek
The longest, most detailed article I've written here, drawn from my commonplace books and bolstered by research in print and on-line. I had this at WP:PR a couple months ago and made some changes then. I know it lacks an image, but otherwise what does the community think? PedanticallySpeaking 18:19, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
- You should probably either remove the additional cast, guest stars, and most of the credits, and turn the ones that remain into prose, or move them all to a separate page and link to that page in the article. --[[User:Brian0918|brian0918 talk]] 18:25, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Yeah, I like the idea of making those lists a separate article and just including the most important ones in the main article. Everyking 11:01, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
-
-
- I disagree. I don't understand why it would be better to have this information in another place. With the article itself is the logical place, just as when the New York Times or Variety reviews something, they give a run-down on the credits. PedanticallySpeaking 17:07, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
-
- Object. Too many lists that aren't formatted well and no images. Can't we get a logo or screenshot? Neutralitytalk 21:54, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Object. No references. You mention two books. See if you can't obtain those and use them to fact check or add material. If you have significantly used some websites for material you can format them as references too. Come on people this is a basic requirement of FA's. Please check the criteria and make sure you meet them all before listing. - Taxman 17:36, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
