Nominated it a few weeks ago, changed some stuff like you guys said. Is this FA-quality? --Twlighter 23:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Quite simply it's too short. Buc 15:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Oppose I think the article should pass a GAC before being nominated for FA. It's not only too short (therefore not broad in coverage) but the image is in preparation for Speedy deletion. Furthermore, it's, currently, only a B class article not yet worthy of even GA status, let alone FA status. Much work needs to be done before even considering another FAC. NSR77TC 23:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Oppose No information on the production, has a trivia section, and lead does not summarize the article. Jay32183 04:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Oppose. Screenshot in infobox has no fair-use rationale, and is also a poor choice for identifying the episode. Absent any role in identification and critical commentary, it's only here for decoration. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.