Talk:Feature extraction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Arcticle start 2 Wikification 3 Article is too biased 4 The article is also too general

[edit] Arcticle start

This is the first complex article that I've started, and I've got an awful feeling that I'm going to be putting far too much into it - so I'll take advice as an when. The topic itself is fairly technical, so it'll take a while to update as I'll have to decide what kind of level I want to pitch it at (by looking at other similar articles), and then get some of the mathematics together.

Ahhh-I've taken too much on :c>

--

Sarcas

[edit] Wikification

As well as a bit of 'wikification', I've turned a couple of the headings here into links, because I think they deserve their own article. Perhaps this page would best serve the role of linking these areas, and introducing each one briefly. Of course, you're perfectly entitled to disagree with this judgement, and merge the articles back. My main aim was to write an article on the Hough transform, because I just implemented it for a piece of coursework :D - IMSoP 17:46, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Article is too biased

This article is too biased in the direction of image processing. Please adapt that into the broader category of dimensionality reduction and draw a clear line with respect to shape recognition:

• JMLR Special Issue on Variable and Feature Selection

Please add also more references to allow unexperienced users to contribute. JKW 09:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I've added a link to a new page I created on Corner detection. May be the bias on image processing can be reducing by citing a few speech processing examples? I might may some speech processing pages if time permits, will link them to here when done. Retardo 02:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The article is also too general

This article appears to have an extremely general scope. It aims at too much and the result does not at all match the expectations. Tpl