Talk:FC Metalurh Zaporizhya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Requested move

FC Metalurh Zaporizhzhya → FC Metalurh Zaporizhya – cut&paste move, requesting to move back in accordance with international usage. Conscious 10:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm surprised to see this move because I believe that international usage is "Metalurh Zaporizhya" [1] (however, there are different versions [2] [3]). Please note that article about the city is Zaporizhzhia.
In case it's decided to use "Zaporizhzhya", I'm requesting a history merge. Conscious 10:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
  • Oppose
    • I oppose only because the correct name of the city is Zaporizhzhia, also maybe translated into Zaporizhzhya. -ILDuceMas 18:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments
  • In Ukrainian it is Запоріжжя, clearly with two of the letter "Zh". I do not think that it makes a huge difference but giving the city a whole different name is wrong. -ILDuceMas 18:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] move discussion closed

I removed the move announcement since the cut'n'paste move was reverted based purely by the fact that cut'n'paste was used. Now, to the issue. As per Romanization of Ukrainian#Table of romanization systems "Doubled consonants ж, х, ц, ч, ш are simplified, for example Запоріжжя→Zaporizhia." Read more at the link above.

For now, I suggest we just discuss the merits. And please no moves by cut'n'paste. We are all friends and we can figure out the best way just by discussing things. Thanks, all! --Irpen 22:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Metalurh Zaporizhzhya new logo.jpeg

Image:Metalurh Zaporizhzhya new logo.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move (Jan, 2008)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Result was move. --Riurik(discuss) 08:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia:NC#Sports_teams, the question is whether the official name of the sports team under consideration has "no ambiguity" or "some ambiguity".

I think that the team's name is ambiguous, because while it has an official English website with its name on it, at least three versions of the name are used:

  1. Football Club "Metallurh Zaporozhye"
  2. Football Club Metalurg
  3. Metalurg

The team's name is also not widely recognized (at most a couple of hundred hits in Google news); if uefa is removed, the count lowers below 100 hits.

Therefore per above naming convention, which states and I quote:

“ (2) in cases where there is some ambiguity as to the official spelling of a club's name in English, the name most commonly used by the English-language media should be used (as determined using the number of hits at Google News) ”
.

This name, in this case, seems to be: FC Metalurh Zaporizhya

"fc metalurh zaporizhya" [4] - 132 with uefa

"fc metalurg zaporozhye" [5] - 0 with uefa

Without uefa "fc metalurh zaporizhya" -uefa 32 "fc metalurg zaporozhye" -uefa 0

There are zero hits in Google News for PFC Metalurg Zaporozhye.

Because of above, the article should be moved to FC Metalurh Zaporizhya.--Riurik(discuss) 01:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Support - as nominator per reasoning explained above.--Riurik(discuss) 01:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • support - agreement with the conventions. Ostap 01:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. per nom. —dima/talk/ 06:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Neutral. The city name is Zaporizhzhya, but official site of the club gives the name "Professional Football Club “Metalurh-Zaporozhye”" (per WP:NC article must be named as at the official english-language site).--Ahonc (Talk) 15:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - the popular name in the English media for the club is Metalurh Zaporizhya. When naming articles, one must consider what the readers know the topic as, which in this case is not Metalurg Zaporozhye. --Boguslav (talk) 01:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.