Talk:FASA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA failed
- 1. Well written? OK (except the lead part)
- 2. Factually accurate? Fail (needs more references)
- 3. Broad in coverage? OK
- 4. Neutral point of view? Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images? OK
Additional comments :
- Lead section is too long (See WP:LEAD) and adds original material/new material not talked through the article.
- Not enough references.
- The Games published by FASA included: section should be renamed to something like Published games or FASA games.
- In this Games published by FASA included: section one would wish to find a description of every games.
- Since most of the wikilinked articles are redlinks, there should be some explanation of the redlink-words to help the reader.
- Under the new commercial direction and with the Mort's capital injection, the company diversified into books and miniature figures. is not well prosed.
- Instead of writing figures or miniature figures shouldn't they be figurines like in Warhammer games or D&D games?
- I seriously doubt the article is broad enough.
- If one has time maybe adding a picture or two would help the article too even if they are well-described fair use pictures.
Lincher 17:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Categories: Start-Class WikiProject Illinois articles | Low-importance Illinois articles | WikiProject Illinois articles | Start-Class Chicago articles | Low-importance Chicago articles | Start-Class video game articles | Mid-priority video game articles | WikiProject Video games articles | Former good article nominees