User talk:Faroukfarouk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Faroukfarouk, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 16:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Linking

When you add links to other wikipedia pages, you do not need the whole URL. Simply put the title of the page you are linking to enclosed in double square brackets. For example, to link to the article Merton Park, type [[Merton Park]] which would appear as Merton Park. Daniel (☎) 11:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Also, the format for external links is

[edit] External Links

[x] Where x is the link. Axeman89 01:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Robert Vial, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Robert Vial. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. olivier 10:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Front Envaliran de Libération

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Front Envaliran de Libération, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Fram 09:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nice edit at Politics of Tokelau

I enjoyed your edits today - especially your prose style and evident knowledge. Keep up the good work! Alice✉ 10:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I see you added the same (or very similar) paragraph to Tokelauan self-determination referendum, 2007, Politics of Tokelau and Tokelau. I think this is most appropriate in the politics article, and have removed it from the other two, since it is not normally desirable to repeat the same content in multiple articles. I think the paragraph is well written, and balanced, but as it does not contain citations for the views expressed within it I have tagged it as possible original research. If you could add citations, the {{or}} tag can be removed.-gadfium 19:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for adding adequate sources, Faroukfarouk. I have taken the liberty of converting them to citeweb format and then removing the original research tag. Merry Christmas to both you and Gadfium! Alice✉ 23:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merry Christmas

Wishing you the very best for the season - Alice✉
Wishing you the very best for the season - Alice✉

[edit] Camille Blanc

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Camille Blanc, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] William Lyon Mackenzie King

Sorry about that. I was in the wrong tab and changed it back. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adeang

Hello. First of all, I'd like to thank you for your continuous contributions to the article on David Adeang. We seem to be the two editors who are keeping it up to date with current events. However, I have strong concerns about your latest edits, which seem not to be in accordance with Wikipedia's NPOV rule. I've stated my concerns here, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks, and I look forward to future collaborative editing with you. Aridd (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Monaco stubs

Hi there, I noticed that you've been adding the {{Monaco stub}} to several articles in the last little while. I agree with quite a few of them, but Prince's Palace of Monaco gave me pause. This is a featured article that was on Wikipedia's main page just a few weeks ago, and it's definitely not a stub. I'm inclined to think that AS Monaco FC isn't a stub either. Do you think you could review your work, and perhaps Wikipedia:STUB to get a sense of when a stub tag might be most appropriate? I've already removed the tag from Prince's Palace, but will leave you reconsider the others. Thanks. Risker (talk) 04:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)