User talk:Faithinhumanity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Faithinhumanity! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

First, let me welcome you and I hope you will work on other religious projects since you have an interest in three religions that I have noted thus far. Listen, don't take the extra nit picking to heart, the article has some guidelines as per the arbitration committee and so it has a bit more rigorous guidelines. So, welcome. PEACETalkAbout 17:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverts on BKWSU

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.

You have reverted the same text twice without seeking consensus. The first revert [1] was back to this version [2] which undid edits by User:IPSOS, User:Sethie and User:Reneeholle. Then a partial revert again [3]. You have also re-introduced a POV version of the first paragraph [4]. Please refrain from making such nonconstructive edits and take a more active role in reaching consensus on the article talk page. Thanks Bksimonb 15:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry, but no

I agree with the consensus of other editors that your edits have a POV skew. If you want me to stop reverting you, try to be more NPOV. IPSOS (talk) 13:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I think it is you who does not understand. Please read about consensus. One of the ways the we discover what consensus is involves being unable to get our changes to stick. That is, that your position is simply outnumbered by other editors. It doesn't have to be some formal discussion on the talk page, and hardly ever involves any sort of vote or straw poll. IPSOS (talk) 13:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't like the tone you are taking with me. Please stop posting on my talk page immediately. Keep your accusations on the article talk page if you must make them. IPSOS (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I clearly asked you to stop posting on my talk page. I will report further posts as harassment. I'm trying to do some other work now. The article talk page is the proper place to discuss a particular article. I'll get to it when I'm less busy. IPSOS (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Please start from where the article is and make the changes you desire WITHOUT reverting. You are undoing purely formatting changes that I've made and that is pissing me off. IPSOS (talk) 14:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

No, I am not simply edit warring. I have fixed a number of minor things in the article, like putting punctuation before ref tags, fixing a problem with div tags in the references, grammar and so forth. Your reverts are undoing that. I have no objection to your moving the article forward. Just do it without undoing other editors improvements. IPSOS (talk) 14:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deceptive edit comments

The edit comment on this edit is deceptive. It is actually a revert of the type I have been explaining why you should not do. It has removed many minor improvements that I've made. Please try to understand my position and do not resort to deception to get your way. IPSOS (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop posting on my talk page. I haven't used any inappropriate language. You got caught making reverts with a deceptive edit comment. Don't do it again. IPSOS (talk) 18:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Also, your last message on my talk page contained personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. IPSOS (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Repeated request

I have asked you not to post on my talk page. Please cease your harassment. I do not choose to continue this discussion with you after your personal attacks. Please confine your discussion to the article on the article talk page. From now on, I will simply remove any further posts on my talk page without reply. You have been warned. IPSOS (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block warning

Post one more time on IPSOS' page and you'll be blocked. You're harassing him. For the future, please remember that you don't get to revert a user on their own talkpage. It's not even a WP:3RR issue: just don't do it at all. Bishonen | talk 19:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC).