Talk:Fadak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Shi'a Islam This article is supported by WikiProject Shi'a Islam, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding and developing articles related to Shi'a Islam. It has been rated - on the quality scale. Saudi Arabia WikiProject (Rated B-Class) Saudi Arabia Portal This article is part of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Saudi Arabia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

December 05-June 07

[edit] Propaganda

Under the Abu Bakr's rea subsection, someone has added a response from a Shia blogsite. Highly unnecesarry, as it has already been stated in the same subsection that the shia disagree with the mentioned explanation. Altering the subsection was in this case about one thing: Propaganda. 194.239.178.165 17:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

"However, these hadiths were never heard before the incident of Fadak, and no one had ever heard them except Abu Bakr."

The above mentioned is a lie! If this were the case, it would not be narrated with a sound chain by the Shia infallible imams now would it? 194.239.178.165 17:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I have also deleted the claim that Al Nasai deemed Fadak to be the personal property of the Prophet. The fact that he included such a narration in his Sunan is not an example of his own personal opinion, as it is a hadith collection, and he dit not deem all its content to be Sahih. 194.239.178.165 (talk) 18:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yet more shia propaganda

The hadith from Bukhari quoted under the 'Umar's era subsection has already been dealt with in the article, and in fact, in no way does it support the claim that some property who was originally the property of Abbas and Ali was restored to them. Therefore, i have deleted it. It actually says:

'Umar said, "Be patient! I beseech you by Allah by Whose Permission the Heaven and the Earth exist, do you know that Allah's Apostle said, 'Our (i.e. prophets') property will not be inherited, and whatever we leave, is Sadaqa (to be used for charity),' and Allah's Apostle meant himself (by saying "we)?" The group said, "He said so." 'Umar then turned to 'Ali and 'Abbas and said, "I beseech you by Allah, do you know that Allah's Apostle said so?" They replied, " He said so."

I guess you did'nt even care to read it. Sa.valikian, in the future, you should participate on the talk pages instead of just writing something in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.239.178.165 (talk) 08:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)