Wikipedia talk:Facts precede opinions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I like the notion, and think we should consider inclusion into WP:NPOV.  — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 21:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "FPO"

"FPO" is a bad choice for a mnemonic acronym, as WP:FPO redirects somewhere else. Perhaps the info in this essay should be with the info in the essay WP:FACTS; saying that if a fact is cited it should not be presented as an attributed opinion. It should be presented as an attributed opinion when significant published dissenting opinions exist (attributed examples of such dissenting opinions should also be presented, of course, IAW WP:NPOV). -- Boracay Bill (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)