User:Fabartus

The deletionists win and I'm voting with my feet.

re CSD criteria and non-policies on notification of interested parties

I've never had the time to fight their idiotic beliefs that less is more and better, save here and there, and I've two of my own to put through college. I see no reason to go on wasting time if some narrow interpretation of an unwise and misbegotten excuse for a guideline can be misconstrued to apply (and worse -- allow a speedy delete sans any notification of anything!!!) to a an article supporting dozens of others. My time is too valuable to go on throwing it away on such ill judged actions by the unwise few... and the hostile environment this creates is finally too much.

   I don't need the aggravations if this community can't be bothered to protect my time by at least requiring a tagging party to notify interested parties when they exercise their judgment. Seems only fair that actions to delete SHOULD AND OF A NECESSITY MUST COST THE APPLYING EDITOR AT LEAST SOME INCONVENIENCE AND PRECIOUS FREE TIME if they want to act in such a derogatory manner to the project's overall content! Never mind the disrespect any "judgment" that this should be deleted when exercised seems never to even pause a breath to consider the time it took others to put together. Instead the opposite attitude reigns—"Let's make it as easy as possible to cut material and damn the time of the many who struggled to put it together—their time is far less valuable than mine, after all. On this the communities continued behavior is pathetically and continually insensitive and childishly SELFISH! Granted it's convenient to those who most fervently believe that less is more. That doesn't make it either right or wise. FrankB 17:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)