Talk:F.C. Porto
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
F.C. Porto is part of WikiProject Portugal, a project to improve all Portugal-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Portugal-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
|
Portugal To-do:
|
|
 |
This Porto-related article is part of a WikiProject to improve the English Wikipedia's coverage of the people, places and attractions of Porto. The aim is to write accurate and up-to-date articles on Porto-related topics. See WikiProject Porto and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. |
 |
 |
F.C. Porto is part of the selected content on the Portugal Portal, which means that it was selected as a high quality Portugal-related article. |
 |
The article on F.C. Porto is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 To-do list for F.C. Porto: |
edit · history · watch · refresh |
|---|---|
|
|
Contents |
[edit] Body Kit Pattern Rendering Problem in IE
The "_stripesandshouldersonwhite" body pattern is not rendering color in Internet Explorer browsers.
For example, the template code "pattern_b1 = _stripesandshouldersonwhite | body1 = 2662BC" is not rendering the stripes and the shoulder line in soft blue color, like it was supposed to, appearing gray instead.
The problem lies with alpha channel transparency, which causes rendering problems in IE. [1]
Suggested fix is using 8-bit palette indexed transparency.
Tmmm 16:45, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Player table
For the sake or readability during the so called "silly season", I'm moving the complete player table here. As soon as the season start, it can be reinserted in the article.
This is the full squad at the end of the 2004/2005 season. Some players were released after the official presentation on 7 August 2004 at the Estádio do Dragão, and others moved in or out at the January transfer window, yet others are on the move to another clubs on the start of the 2005/06 season.
Released players that played during the pre-season: Marco Ferreira, Rossato, Paulo Assunção, Edgaras Jankauskas and Bruno Moraes.
Players moving out during the January transfer window: Hugo Leal (loaned to Académica), Carlos Alberto (sold to Corinthians), César Peixoto (loaned to Vitória SC), Derlei (Sold to Dynamo Moscow), Maciel (loaned to Atlético Paranaense), Hugo Almeida (loaned to Boavista FC).
At the end of the season, more player left the club: Seitaridis, Maniche and Costinha will join Derlei in Dynamo Moscow and other players such as Luís Fabiano and Cláudio are said to be on the move.
key: The first letter, L,C and R represent the field position, while D is for defensive and A is for attacking. In the case of the second letter, D stands for defence, M for midfield, F for forward, and W for winger.
wS 23:17, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 2005-06 preseason team archive
[edit] Name change
Does anyone have a problem if I change the title to FC Porto or F.C. Porto? This club is known in English by FC Porto (Ef Cee Porto), and that's the title of every club you can find, except from Sporting Clube de Portugal which is the name chosen by the club to be used by UEFA in official competitions. Give me feedback, please. Joaopais 23:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] FC Porto squad
Was trying to fix squad composition and screwed chart, now cannot arrange it back. SORRY!!!
VASCO AMARAL, PORTUGAL (User n.217.129.67.28)
Regarding the Total spending in acquisitions, the previous value was not correct.
"As aquisições de “passes” feitas no semestre findo em 31 de Dezembro de 2007 (incluindo o valor dos respectivos passes e outros montantes directamente relacionados com as aquisições) atingiram o montante global de 25.051.774 Euros, o qual inclui 6.650.000 Euros relativo a aquisição dos restantes 50% do “passe” do jogador Lucho Gonzalez.
Adicionalmente, as aquisições dos “passes” dos jogadores Stepanov, Ernesto Farias e Bolatti ascenderam ao montante global de 15.490.848 Euros, os quais, em conjunto com o montante afecto à aquisição dos 50% do “passe” do jogador Lucho Gonzalez, acima referido, representam 88% do valor das aquisições realizadas no semestre findo em 31 de Dezembro de 2007. Os restantes montantes de aquisições"
Porto invested 25.051.755 Euros and not 15.500.000 euros. The 15,5 M is (as the text states) the value invested only in 3 players: Ernesto Farias, Stepanov and Bolatti. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.154.10 (talk) 17:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Porto History!
There is no evidences that the club started in 1893. A former president and founder of the club wrote a text in 1926 that a group left "Grupo do Destino" in 1906 to start Foot-ball Club do Porto with no references to any connections to António Nicolau de Almeida, the man said to be the founder of the club. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.159.28 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 11 October 2007
-
- If you can read portuguese, read this. If you can't, the very first sentence translates as follows: "There is not a shadow of a doubt: Foot Ball Club do Porto was founded on 28 September 1893." Also, check the club's website or the "Dragão Ano 111" books, the official history of FC Porto. It has been established as a fact that the FC Porto founded in 1893 is the one that was reactivated in 1906 and the one we know today. Lampadinha 23:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
The only thing you are saying, and that is the only thing that was proven till today, is that there was a club with the same name in Oporto between 1983 and 1984.
The founders of the actual F C Porto had nothing to do with that and knew nothing about it, so they did not reactivate the club. This "reactivation" was conceived many years after when someone read old news papers and found that Nicolau de Almeida existed. A nice story was created but no facts have ever shown that Nicolau de Almeida ever met the ones who left "Grupo do Destino" to found FCPorto.
This decision was taken during the PINTO da COSTA presidency... till then the foundation of Porto was 2nd of August 1906.
All the "official" things you show were made in the last years... during the same presidency and the value of it is 0. History should not be changed!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.159.28 (talk) 06:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- I know the decision to change the club's birth date was made during Pinto da Costa's presidency, because documents were found proving that the club was the same one. Or at least that's what it says in ALL sources, because I've obviously not seen the documents myself. If you've been checking the facts/documents/archives yourself and think all sources are wrong and the FC Porto founded in 1906 has nothing to do with the FC Porto founded in 1893, write a book about it and then you can include that information as an alternative version. Until then, we'll just have to let the article as it is, even if you are 100% sure of the opposite, because as we all know Wikipedia has a no original research policy. Lampadinha 07:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Madjer.jpg
Image:Madjer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Fcporto.jpg
Image:Fcporto.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Confusion
There's a big mistake that should be correct, the case that is related with the decision of Porto won't play on next season for Champions League is Apito Final, not Apito Dourado. They are two diferent cases. The same that make Porto loose 6 points this season. See: [2]
Aritajustino (talk) 23:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
