Talk:Eyology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
Stub This page has been rated as stub-Class on the quality assessment scale
??? This page has not yet received a rating on the importance assessment scale.
This article is being improved by WikiProject Rational Skepticism. Wikiproject Rational Skepticism seeks to improve the quality of articles dealing with science, pseudosciences, pseudohistory and skepticism. Please feel free to help us improve this page.

See Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine. Please visit the project page for more details, or ask questions on talk.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Votes for deletion
This article was nominated for deletion on May 23, 2005. The result was to keep. An archived record of this vote can be found here.

Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:01, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Seriously, Eyology? That term looks so made-up. I can't find it in any real dictionary online. So I'm nominating this for deletion. Revolución 01:39, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

It's legitimate. See comments at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Log/2005_May_23#Eyology -- Barfooz (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Eyology is a term that encompasses the various iridologies (physical iridology, personality iridology, etc.) and sclerology. Eyology, as a holistic science, deals with the whole of the human being, understanding its qualities (physical, mental, emotional, personality, etc.) as seen by the various markings in the irises and in the whites of the eyes. According to whom? "Eyology" simply describes the combination of iridology and sclerology. I love the comment on the Vfd to expand this! The article is already one sentence longer than it needs to be. Edwardian 07:04, 17 July 2005 (UTC)